COMMON CANCER CAUSES NOT TALKED ABOUT

“In spite of decades of research and millions of dollars spent, the cancer establishment remains myopically fixated on obsolete “blame-the-victim” theories of breast cancer causation, while ignoring growing evidence of the role of environmental contaminants.” Said Dr. Samuel Epstein, an internationally recognized authority on environmental pollution and cancer.

In November 1992 the Greenpeace study was released. They were the first to review existing scientific literature on breast cancer and the environment. Putting them all together and releasing the key findings:

U.S. counties with toxic waste sites were 6.5 times more likely to have elevated breast cancer rates than those without waste sites.

Women with breast cancer tend to have higher levels of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyl’s (PCBs) in their tissue than women without breast cancer.

Women working in industries with elevated levels of chemical exposure

including exposure to dioxin-have very high rates of breast cancer.

Prior to 1976, levels of chlorinated pesticides and breast cancer rates were higher in Israel than virtually anywhere else in the world. In the decade following a government ban on three of these pesticides, breast cancer rates dropped to levels similar to those of other nations. Joe Thornton who authored the Greenpeace study says; “well under half of all breast cancer cases are actually linked to the ACS risk factors. Ample evidence points to chlorine-based chemicals as significant contributors to this epidemic.”

The American Cancer Society, which keeps record, estimates that in 1998 178,700 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed among women in the United States and 1/3 will die. An estimated 1,600 cases will be diagnosed among men.


BREAST CANCER LINKED TO CHLORINE

As the tide of chemicals born of the Industrial Age has arisen to engulf

our environment, a drastic change has come about in the nature of the most

serious public health problems. For the first time in the history of the

world, every human being is now subject to contact with dangerous

chemicals, from the moment of conception until death. - Rachel Carson,

Silent Spring 1962

Two years after Rachel Carson wrote these words in her groundbreaking book, “Silent Spring,” she died of breast cancer. Three decades later, pollution of the global environment and our bodies has grown more severe. Simultaneously, breast cancer is now the leading cause of death for women between the ages of 40 and 55, second only to Lung cancer.

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER - American Cancer Society 1998 - Breast cancer rates have risen steadily since the dawn of the chemical age. From 1940 to 1982, breast cancer rated increased by 12 percent each year. But more recently, rates have skyrocketed. From 1980 to 1987 alone, the number of breast cancer cases reported in the U.S. rose by 32 percent and continue to do so. Fifty years ago, one in 20 women got breast cancer. Today a woman has a one-in-eight chance of developing breast cancer.

In 1980 the World Health Organization stated that 80 percent of cancers

were due to synthetic carcinogens. But the American Cancer Society - which is partially funded by the pharmaceuticals and influenced by the chemical companies-, would have us believe that the cause is primarily personal. If we only modify our habits, and that is good, but does not explain why 70 to 80 percent do not fall within the American Cancer Society’s three risk categories.

The Ralph Nader Group did an environmental study - privately funded -

that shows that breast cancer along with cancer of the kidneys, skin, testes, prostate, and lung as well as non-Hodgkin’s’ lymphoma, malignant myeloma and numerous childhood cancers increased according to the amounts of pollutants, largely, Chlorine in the water.

Taken from the Science News Vol. 142 on the Environment - Studies have documented in drinking water of many potentially toxic volatile organic chemicals. (VOCs) - from chloroform and pesticides to carbon tetrachloride.

Such findings have spurred investigations into the INHALATION HAZARDS these

compounds may pose when released into the air during baths and showers… The

most volatile chemical studied in the experiments was a Freon known as

CFC-ll. Little’s worst-case analyses indicate that people showering for 10

minutes in water containing this VOC would inhale 50 percent more of the

potential toxicant than they would ingest by drinking two liters of that

water…

Taking long hot showers is a health risk, according to research

presented in Anaheim, California at a meeting of the American Chemical

Society. Showers, and to a lesser extent baths, lead to a greater exposure

to toxic chemicals contained in water supplies, than drinking the water.

The chemicals evaporate out of the water and are inhaled. They can also

spread through the house and be inhaled by others. Family members can receive 6 to 100 times more of the chemicals by breathing the air around showers and bathtubs than they would by drinking the water.

New Scientist, September 18, 1986
Bottom Line/August 1987
Dr. John Andelman, PhD.

Doubles Risk

Drinking chlorinated water may as much as double the risk of bladder

cancer, which strikes 40,000, people a year? U.S. News & World Report July 29, 1991

There was a higher incidence of cancer of the esophagus, rectum, breasts

and larynx and of Hodgkin’s Disease among those drinking chlorinated surface waters. U. S. News & World Report, July 29, 1991

Is Your Water Safe-The Dangerous State of Your Water

Worse Than Drinking Water?

Conservative calculations indicate that inhalation exposures can be as significant as exposure from drinking the water; i.e., one can be exposed to just as much by inhalation during a shower as by drinking 2 liters of water a day.

Dr. H. Brown reported in the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH “Showering is suspected as the primary cause of elevated chloroform in nearly every home because of chlorine in the water.” Chloroform acts as a carcinogen in the body. A Professor of Water Chemistry at the University of Pittsburgh claims that toxic exposure to vaporized chemical in the water supplies through showering, bathing and inhalation from hot dishwater is 100 times greater than through drinking the water.

When you shower, where does the water strike your body harder and stronger? Our upper body receives the force of the flow and is absorbed through our tissues. Ironically, in the areas where drinking water chlorination is increased, so has cancer! (Found in the Ralph Nader Group environmental study).

As chlorine is added to kill pathogenic microorganisms, the highly 

reactive chlorine combines with fatty acids and carbon fragments to form a variety of toxic compounds, which comprise of 30% of the chlorination by-products.

The NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES estimates that 200 to 1,000 people die in the United States each year from cancers caused by ingesting the contaminates in the water. The major health threat posed by these pollutants is far more likely to be from their inhalation as air pollutants. The reason that emissions are high is because water droplets disperse by shower heads have a larger surface-to-volume ration than water steaming into the bath.

“On one hand, chlorination has freed civilization from the constant dangers of waterborne epidemics. On the other hand in the mid - 70s scientists discovered that chlorination could create carcinogens in water.”…”80% of the population drinks chlorinated water.”… “There was a higher incidence of cancer of the esophagus, rectum, breast, and larynx and of Hodgkin’s Disease among those drinking chlorinated surface waters.”…”Volatile organics can evaporate from water in a shower or bath.”…”Conservative calculations indicate that inhalation exposures can be as significant as exposure from drinking the water, that is, one can be exposed to just as much by inhalation during a shower as by drinking 2 liters of water a day.”…”People who shower frequently could be exposed through ingestion, inhalation and/or dermal absorption.”

Is Your Water Safe to Drink?
Consumer Reports Books

“Skin absorption of contaminant has been underestimated and ingestion may not constitute the sole or even primary route of exposure.”

American Journal of Public Health
Dr. Halina Brown


**DETOXING AND IMPROVING YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM FUNCTION CAN IMPROVE YOUR CHANCES OF NOT GETTING CANCER!

Whether you eat a balanced diet or not you are probably mal-nourished. This fact has been known for over 60 years but we have not been warned or given information to help us correct the deficiencies. WITH IMPROPER NUTRIENTS AND MINERALS WE HAVE WEAKENED IMMUNE SYSTEMS.

VERBATIM UNABRIDGED EXTRACTS FROM THE 74TH CONGRESS 2ND SESSION:

In 1936 the American government released Senate Document No. 264, stating that, “Our physical well-being is more directly dependent upon minerals we take into our systems than upon calories or vitamins, or upon precise proportions of starch, protein or carbohydrates we consume.”

“Do you know that most of us today are suffering from certain dangerous diet deficiencies which cannot be remedied until depleted soils from which our food comes are brought into proper mineral balance?”

“The alarming fact is that foods (fruits, vegetables and grains) now being raised on millions of land that no longer contain enough of certain minerals are starving us - no matter how much of them we eat. No man of today (1936) can eat enough fruits and vegetable to supply his system with the minerals he requires.”

“The truth is that our foods vary enormously in value, and some of them aren’t worth eating as food. Our physical well-being is more directly dependent upon the minerals we take into our systems than upon calories or vitamins or upon the precise proportions of starch, protein or carbohydrates we consume.”

“Laboratory tests prove that the fruits, the vegetables, the grains, the eggs, and even the milk and the meats of today are not what they were a few generations ago (which doubtless explains why our forefathers thrived on a selection of foods that would starve us today!)”

“ No man today can eat enough fruits and vegetables to supply his stomach with the mineral salts he requires for perfect health, because his stomach isn’t big enough to hold them! And we are turning into a nation of big stomachs.” Boy has that come-to-pass.

“It is bad news to learn from our leading authorities that 99% of the American people are deficient in these minerals, and that a marked deficiency in any one of the more important minerals actually results in disease. Any upset of the balance, any considerable lack of one or another element, however microscopic the body requirements may be, and we sicken, suffer, shorten our lives.”

BUILDING YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM THE NATURAL WAY!!

Using a natural, drug-free remedy, as nature intended it to be for a healthy body that promotes a healthy mind. Unlike traditional medicine, homeopathic treatments stimulate symptoms and prompt the body to heal itself. In place of more chemicals in your body try natural. Prevention is the best way of staying health, but if you have not been able to stave off an ordinary, simply illness, homeopathy is the safe, healthy way to treat your body. It does not simply alleviate symptoms. This SAFE and EFFECTIVE treatment prompts the body to heal itself. And the ingredients in these combination remedies reinforce one another for optimum health benefits.

A number of controlled studies have been performed which show the effectiveness of homeopathic medicine in treating a number of diseases. The best summary of this research is a study published in the British Medical Journal. The authors of this study are not homeopaths but medical school professors asked by the Dutch government to review the existing research.

*Clinical trials of Homeopathy, Kleijnen, Jos; Paul Knipschild; Gerben ter

Riet, British Medical Journal, February 9, 1991 v302 n6772 p316(8).*


Mineral Necessity in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Anna Cocilovo, A Physician assistant in Prescott Arizona, practices natural medicine and acupuncture, writes for the Prescott Courier Newspaper. This is an excerpt from one of her columns. “Stress wastes Magnesium and magnesium relieves stress. When challenged by a stressor, the body releases adrenaline to prepare one for fight or flight. One effect of adrenaline is to block the uptake of magnesium by the cells. This raises the level of magnesium in the blood so it can be used where most needed. But in this day and age of epidemic chronic stress, magnesium becomes depleted from the cell.

When one experiences a defeat or loss (divorce, death, job loss, etc.) the physiological response shifts from adrenaline to cortisone secretion. If one mourns, moves on and learns, the body returns back to balance. But if instead chronic depression sets in, cortisone levels remain elevated causing increased loss of magnesium through the kidneys. People with adequate magnesium stores react with less irritation, irritability, and have diminished adrenaline response.

Interestingly, North Americans develop osteoporosis (softening of the bones) while Africans do not. This is despite the fact that Americans consume more calcium and Vitamin D than Africans, who consume more magnesium. Magnesium enhances calcium absorption, while deficiency of magnesium causes increased loss of calcium in the urine. While adequate calcium intake is important in preventing osteoporosis, calcium supplementation without magnesium will deplete magnesium. In the presence of magnesium, the need for calcium will be decreased.

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating disease which, oversimplified, is like getting the flu and never getting over it. The Center for Disease Control has made CFS a top priority, at the same level as uncontrolled E-coli and tuberculosis. Many with CFS also suffer from fibromyalgia (FM). FM is a syndrome characterized by widespread chronic musculoskeletal pain. Magnesium is well recognized by experts in the field to be very useful in CFS and FM. In double blind randomized study published in the Lancet in 1991, patents with CFS were found to have lower red blood cell magnesium levels than controls. When treated with injectable magnesium, the treatment group reported significantly improved energy levels, improved emotional state, and less pain compared to placebo group. Probably the primary mechanism of action explains this result is the crucial role magnesium plays in ATP production. ATP, formed from breakdown of food is the cell’s equivalent to fuel for you! It provides the energy necessary for muscles to move. In CFS and FM, the body’s ability to make ATP is compromised. The body responds by breaking down precious muscle tissue to get at stored ATP. Fatigue and pain, and spasms result. A vicious cycle is created as the chronic pain and stress causes further magnesium wasting.

As one would expect, the less expensive magnesium supplements are the more poorly absorbed.”

 

To Herbal Pharmacy of Preventing Cancer