A government analysis shows the nation's waterways are awash in traces of
chemicals used in beauty aids, medications, cleaners, and foods. Among the
substances: caffeine, contraceptives, painkillers, insect repellent, perfumes,
and nicotine.
Scientists say the problem is that these substances largely escape
regulation and defy municipal wastewater treatment. And the long-term effects
of exposure are unclear, they say.
The compounds are sold on supermarket shelves and found in virtually every
medicine cabinet and broom closet as well as at farms and factories. And they
are flushed or rinsed down the drain every day. But they do not disappear,
researchers warn.
Hydrologists with the U.S. Geologic Survey tested water samples in 30
states for 95 common compounds, an emerging class of contaminants known as
pharmaceutical and personal care pollutants (PPCPs). The results of the
three-year analysis appear in the March 15 issue of the journal Environmental
Science and Technology. The scientists found that the chemicals persist in
the environment in concentrations as low as one part per billion or less. The
results mirror similar studies of PPCPs in Europe and Canada.
Yet little is known about PPCPs' potential health and environmental
effects. The use and disposal of 81 of the 95 compounds in the study are
entirely unregulated, officials said. "Compounds that we use in
households or even consume can persist though watewater treatment and affect
resources on a pretty broad scale," said Herb Buxton, USGS coordinator of
the USGS toxic substances hydrology program.
For example, many scientists suspect the widespread use of antibacterial
agents in human medicines, household cleaners, and veterinary medicines has
encouraged the development of germs that are resistant to antibiotics. The
USGS study found at least 31 antibiotics and antibacterial compounds in water
samples.
The study also tallied traces of at least 11 compounds linked to birth
control and hormone supplements. Some studies have linked environmental
exposure to hormones to deformed sex organs in wildlife, sex reversal in some
fish, and declining fertility in humans, as well as cancers and other
diseases.
Scientists who did not participate in the USGS survey said PPCPs represent
the "next big unknown" in environmental contamination.
Exposure to even tiny amounts may result in cumulative risks, they said,
especially when the compounds combine in unanticipated ways. "You don't
need therapeutic doses of a drug to have an effect," said Christian
Daughton of the Environmental Protection Agency's exposure research laboratory
in Las Vegas. "Some organisms have potential to suffer multigenerational
exposures. Parts per billion could have profound effects."
Industry and water utility officials said they expect the EPA to decide in
the next few years how to regulate PPCPs. They said promising new wastewater
treatment technologies can break down many of the chemicals using biological
methods or even exposure to ultraviolet light.
"We're not ignoring it," said Alan Roberson, regulatory affairs
director for the American Water Works Association in Washington. "One
question is what do you do with the concentrated form of these chemical
compounds if you take them of the water?"
In 1999-2000, USGS scientists collected samples downstream from cities,
farms, and factories. Many of the waterways contribute to municipal water
supplies. They included the Sacramento River at Freeport, Calif.; the South
Platte River in Denver; the Mississippi River above Minneapolis/St. Paul; and
the Charles River in Boston. Seven or more chemicals were found in half of the
streams sampled.
In addition to caffeine, the USGS reported the most frequently detected
compounds were coprostanol and cholesterol, which are byproducts of digestion.
Also found frequently was DEET, a common insect repellent. Among the
medications found were the blood thinner Warfarin, antidepressants, and
blood-pressure medicine.